What causes antibiotic resistance in bacteria?


These notes are to introduce you to the problems of antibiotic resistance, with particular reference to problems studied at the University of Leeds

Link to list of subjects

 

Bacteria have evolved numerous strategies for resisting the action of antibiotics and antibacterial agents. This is particularly true of those bacteria that are antibiotic producers. Bacteria that produce antibiotics do so to gain a selective advantage over other, competing microbes in their natural environment. If they were sensitive to their own metabolic products, such a selective advantage would be lost.

In many hospital units, exploitation of antibiotics is very intensive and this generates an enormous selective pressure for bacteria to acquire the means by which they may become antibiotic-resistant. Under such circumstances, it is not unusual to find that bacteria exhibit resistance to more than one group of antibiotics. Resistance to a particular agent may be accomplished by more than one resistance mechanism. Bacteria may display antibiotic resistance by one or more of the following mechanisms:-

  They may lack a target for the antibiotic;

Chlamydia do not have peptidoglycan and are not susceptible to the action of penicillins.

The antibiotic target may be inaccessible;

Peptidoglycan in Gram-negative bacteria is inaccessible to penicillins that cannot penetrate the Gram-negative outer membrane. Efflux pumps can actively pump out antibiotics from cells. Gram-negative bacteria resist the activity of tetracyclines by this important mechanism.

The antibiotic target may be modified to prevent the action of the drug;

Trimethoprim resistance is manifest by alterations in the DHFR target enzyme; quinolone resistance is effected by point mutations in the DNA gyrase, which prevent binding of the drug to its target.

The antibiotic may be chemically modified or destroyed;

Important examples include the huge range of b-lactamases and the various aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Chloramphenicol resistance is most often manifest by acetylation by the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase enzyme.

Bacteria may elaborate alternative pathways, avoiding the drug target;

Meticillin resistance in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus results from the production of an additional penicillin binding protein: PBP2', which is not susceptible to inhibition by penicillins.

 


Not all bacteria have peptidoglycan in their cell wall. Rickettsias and chlamydia, for example, lack peptidoglycan. Such bacteria are intrinsically resistant to the action of cell wall inhibitors such as the penicillins and cephalosporins. Interestingly, although chlamydia do not make peptidoglycan they do possess penicillin-binding proteins. This raises the fascinating question, why? What role do these enzymes fulfil in a bacterium that does not have a cell wall?

 


Having a target that is inaccessible to antibiotics may be achieved in a variety of ways. The outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria may act as a permeability barrier for antibiotics. Many Gram-negative bacteria are intrinsically resistant to antibiotics like benzyl penicillin because such drugs cannot penetrate the outer membrane and so cannot reach their target.

Alterations to the side chain attached to the penicillin nucleus may overcome the problem of membrane penetration and semi-synthetic penicillins such as ampicillin have a broad-spectrum of activity, encompassing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Another way in which bacteria deny access of an antibiotic to its target is actively to pump the drug out of the cell. Gram-negative bacteria may resist the activity of tetracyclines through an energy-dependent active efflux of the drug.

 


Modification of the antibiotic target is often seen in laboratory generated mutants. For example, bacteria resistant to trimethoprim produce an alternative dihydrofolate reductase. Resistance to the quinolone antimicrobials results from point mutations in the gene encoding DNA gyrase. Aminoglycoside resistance may result from modifications of the ribosome structure. Indeed, in the laboratory ribosomes may be further altered so that they only function in the presence of aminoglycosides. The drug acts to stabilise the functional ribosome in aminoglycoside-dependent bacteria.

 


Many clinically important bacteria produce enzymes that are capable of chemically modifying or destroying antibiotics. Chloramphenicol may be acetylated by the action of chloramphenicol acetyltransferases. Aminoglycosides may be acetylated by aminoglycoside acetyltransferases, phosphorylated by aminoglycoside phosphotransferases or conjugated with nucleotides. Such modifications render the antibiotic inactive.

Antibiotics may also be enzymatically degraded to an inactive form. The b-lactam bond can be hydrolysed by a large family of enzymes known as the b-lactamases. Some b-lactamases have a preferential activity against penicillins and these are referred to as penicillinases. Cephalosporinases are more active against cephalosporins.

Recently broad-spectrum b-lactamases have evolved that have activity against both penicillins and cephalosporins. There are families of such enzymes that have arisen as the result of point mutations accumulating in the genes that code for penicillinases. Many of these new enzymes are encoded by self-transmissible plasmids and these new resistance determinants can spread with great ease.

 


Not all b-lactamase activity is associated with bacterial cells. Human kidney cells produce an analogous enzyme that, although it does not readily attack penicillins and cephalosporins, rapidly destroys carbapenems such as imipenem. Because of this, imipenem is administered together with cilastatin, an inhibitor of the human kidney enzyme. This delays the breakdown of imipenem sufficiently to permit it to be active in treating bacterial infection.

 

Staphylococci have been associated with the production of b-lactamase for many years. Early in the history of the development of semi-synthetic penicillins, compounds were manufactured that were able to resist the activity of staphylococcal penicillinase. These drugs had side-chains that prevented the staphylococcal b-lactamase from binding to the antibiotic and hydrolysing it. Meticillin, a penicillin that is stable in the presence of staphylococcal b-lactamase, was introduced into clinical practice during the 1960's. Until recently, meticillin was known as "methicillin".

Shortly after the introduction of meticillin into medical practice, resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated from hospital units where the drug was in regular use. Meticillin-resistance is greater at 30oC than at 37oC. Resistance is due to the temperature-sensitive production of an extra penicillin binding protein, PBP 2', that is not susceptible to inhibition by meticillin. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus also produce a b-lactamase and they are generally resistant to a very wide range of antimicrobials. Infections caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus can thus be difficult to treat.

 


In some cases the only drugs available effectively to treat infections caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are the glycopeptides such as vancomycin. Bacterial resistance to this agent was unknown until recently. Vancomycin resistance first appeared in enterococci. These bacteria are resistant to all currently available standard antimicrobial therapies. In an experiment of dubious ethical status, the gene encoding vancomycin resistance was transferred in the laboratory from a vancomycin-resistant enterococcus into a meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In 1997, the first naturally occurring vancomycin-resistant, meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus appeared in Japan. New antibiotics used in the treatment of MRSA include synercid - a combination of quinupristin and dalfopristin - and the new broad-spectrum tetracycline tigecycline. It remains to be seen how long these will remain effective.

 


Some antimicrobial resistance genes have only ever been found located on the bacterial chromosome. Others have been found to lie on plasmids. Plasmids encoding antibiotic resistance are often called resistance factors, R-factors or R-plasmids. R-plasmids may encode resistance to several unrelated antibiotics.

Some R-plasmids are self-transmissible and can move from strain to strain, even between different bacterial genera. Other R-plasmids, although not self-transmissible may be mobilised by other plasmids, that need not necessarily encode antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes are frequently located within transposons. These can move more or less at random around the bacterial genome.

Genes encoded by transposons may thus spread very easily because many transposable elements may become associated with transmissible plasmids. In this way, antibiotic resistance genes may become rapidly disseminated. Control of antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic microbes is one of the greatest challenges currently facing medical microbiology. If we are unsuccessful, we will surely enter the post-antibiotic era.

Some important examples of antibiotic resistance studied
at the University of Leeds

Aminoglycoside resistance in Serratia marcescens

 

Six babies on the SCBU developed systemic infection caused by Serratia marcescens and two died as a result of their infection. All six isolates were resistant to netilmicin; the aminoglycoside then used to treat neonates because of its apparent lack of toxicity. Netilmicin was used as empirical therapy on the SCBU at the time of the incident.

 


Netilmicin-sensitive Serratia marcescens were isolated during environmental sampling of the SCBU during this incident. Exposure of these bacteria to netilmicin or to kanamycin quickly leads to the selection of a resistance phenotype that is relatively slow to return to a sensitive phenotype.

 


Resistance in these bacteria was the result of increased expression of the aac6' gene, encoding an aminoglycoside modifying enzyme. The AAC6' acetylates the aminoglycosides at their 6' site, thus inactivating them. Kanamycin and netilmicin are inactivated by this enzyme; other clinically important aminoglycosides do not act as substrates for this enzyme.

 


Mutations in the gene promoter are responsible for its overproduction in resistant isolates of Serratia marcescens. ALL strains of this bacterium carry a copy of the aac6' gene and thus have the potential to mutate to a resistant phenotype. In most strains, this gene is expressed at very low levels and thus bacteria appear susceptible upon laboratory testing. Exposure of sensitive Serratia marcescens rapidly selects resistant mutants that only very slowly revert to a sensitive phenotype. The AAC6' enzyme probably has an important yet unidentified role in the metabolism of Serratia marcescens.

Tetracycline resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae

 

The tet(M) gene was first observed in streptococci but, in 1985, it first caused resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Treatment failures appeared more or less simultaneously in Georgia, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire. Within six months, tetracycline-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae had appeared in seventeen states in the USA.

 


In addition, in 1985, tetracycline-resistant isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae were found in Holland. This mirrored an event ten years previously, when penicillin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae evolved independently in Africa and Asia. Penicillin resistance is caused by the production of a b-lactamase.

 


In 1990, strains of tetracycline-resistant penicillin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae had evolved. Tetracycline-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae had also spread globally. The first tetracycline-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United Kingdom appeared in 1987, isolated in Leeds.

 


The tet(M) gene is often found in a transposon, but not in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, where it is stably inserted into a plasmid. The structure of the "American" and the "Dutch" plasmids are different and close inspection shows that the tet(M) genes on the plasmids are also distinct from one another. Tetracycline-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated from Gabon have a "Dutch-type" plasmid but an "American-type" gene.

 

The following bacterial genera harbour the tet(M) gene on their chromosomes:

  • Mycoplasma;
  • Ureaplasma;
  • Gardnerella;
  • Campylobacter;
  • Clostridium;
  • Listeria;
  • Fusobacterium;
  • Veillonella;
  • Peptostreptococcus;

while in the following genera the tet(M) gene has a plasmid location:

  • Kingella;
  • Eikenella;
  • Gardnerella
  • Haemophilus;
  • Neisseria;
  • Clostridium;
  • Listeria;
  • Fusobacterium.
Note that in some bacteria, tet(M) is found both on the chromosome and on plasmids.

Extended-spectrum b-lactamase in the paediatric oncology ward,
St James` University Hospital, Leeds

 

Over a ten-week period in the paediatric oncology unit of St James' University Hospital, six children had septicaemia caused by a member of the Enterobacteriaceae that produced an extended-spectrum b-lactamase. In the case of one child, two separate cases of septicaemia were recorded.

 
After the occurrence of the first episode, a surveillance programme was initiated where the faecal flora of children on the ward was tested by plating onto agar containing ceftazidime, the extended-spectrum cephalosporin then in use on the unit. This revealed that clinical disease was the tip of the iceberg of resistant bacteria. Twenty-one children of the forty-four children (48% of patients) were colonised with a bacterium that produced an ESBL at some point in the 10 weeks.
 
Resistant bacteria included:
  • 28 Escherichia coli,
  • 28 Klebsiella oxytoca,
  • 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae,
  • 10 Citrobacter freundii,
  • 3 Enterobacter sp. &
  • 1 Serratia marcescens.
 

Resistance to ceftazidime was conferred by b-lactamases of the TEM family. These bacteria all showed multiple resistance and were resistant to antibiotics in classes other than the b-lactams.

 
Transfer of ceftazidime resistance to a lab strain of Escherichia coli was attempted for all 81 strains in the study but was only successful from 25 strains (31%).  Attempts were made to identify the enzymes responsible for this incident using:
  • spectrum of antimicrobial activity,
  • biochemical examination including enzyme kinetics,
  • iso-electric focusing &
  • nucleotide sequence determination.
 
Three ESBL's were implicated in this study: TEM-26B was produced by 42 isolates, 40 isolates produced TEM-12B and only two produced TEM-10B. The genes encoding TEM-12 and TEM-26 can each be generated from that encoding TEM-10 by a single mutation.
 
Strains could express more than one ESBL. The occurrence of these three enzymes provides evidence of convergent evolution. Silent mutations differentiate the St James' enzymes from their counterparts elsewhere. In the case of one gene, encoding TEM-12B there is evidence that the gene lies on a novel transposon. Although TEM-1 and TEM-2 are commonly encoded by transposons, it seems to be rare for ESBL genes are transposable.
 
Analysis of ribotypes provides evidence of cross-contamination between patients. This is unsurprising since children are allowed, indeed encouraged, to mix freely. This is of enormous psychological benefit to children who are suffering form life-threatening disease.
 
Cross-contamination was insufficient to explain the epidemiology of the incident. There was also some evidence of transfer of resistance within the microflora of a single patient. There was not, however, a single epidemic plasmid, such as has been described in France, for example.
 
The epidemiology also showed a surprisingly high rate of de novo mutation from narrow- to extended-spectrum resistance. Is this due to the concurrent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and anti-neoplastic agents?
 
The study has been continued on an intermittent basis. Because of the number of clinical episodes, a decision was taken to stop use of ceftazidime and other extended-spectrum cephalosporins in 1987. Despite the fact that they have not been used, bacteria producing ESBL's are still isolated in the unit today.
 
A number of methods were used to try to identify the ESBL's in this study. Only nucleotide determination provided an unequivocal identification. Enzyme kinetics is technically demanding and is unable to differentiate enzymes easily. Iso-electric focusing is also unreliable. Point mutations may alter the iso-electric point significantly, whereas a number of changes in gene structure may have an overall null effect on the iso-electric points of distantly related proteins.
 
Workers have suggested oligonucleotide probing of areas known to contain mutations but this technique will miss novel mutations. Reluctantly, we decided that full nucleotide sequence determination was the only method to identify a bla gene unambiguously. This was not undertaken on all isolates. Rather, we used epidemiological typing to identify the minimum set needed to be certain of the identities of the b-lactamases in this study.
 
Nucleotide sequence determination was costly and time consuming but resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins was becoming increasingly common. Our results showed that the ESBL's in this incident could be derived from each other by simple point mutations. This raises the question, ...is there a better way rapidly to identify an ESBL in future outbreaks? For the very interested, the answer is yes.

Link to list of topics


Page edited April 2006


Microbiology Teaching Page


The information on this web site is copyrighted.

© John Heritage 2004, 2006


The information on this web site is provided as is with no warranty as to its accuracy or fitness.

The information is being released only for use by students of the University of Leeds.

It is not being released for access by any other persons.

It is solely for use by students of the University of Leeds. If any other party aside from students of the University of Leeds should access this information, the University of Leeds accepts no responsibility for any such unauthorised use.


Valid HTML 4.01!
Validated by A-Prompt